Potential New Salary Minimum for Exempt Employees

money on deskThe test for classifying employees as exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime requirements may be briefly summarized as follows:  the employee must be paid on a salary basis (i.e., receive the same base salary amount every workweek regardless of the number of hours worked), and the employee must perform duties which satisfy the regulatory requirements for exemption as an executive, professional or administrative employee.  But there is another element to the exemption test, namely the minimum salary threshold.

Until about ten years ago, the minimum salary threshold was a non-factor in assessing exempt status.  A minimum salary of $155 per week was established by Department of Labor regulation in 1975, and was unchanged for the rest of the century.  By 1997, the federal minimum wage was $5.15 per hour, so  that anyone who was being legally paid for a 40-hour week would qualify for the minimum salary for exemption.

A major revision and overhaul of the FLSA regulations in 2004 included an increase in the salary threshold to a more realistic $455 per week ($23,660 per year).  In response to a directive from President Obama, for the past year the Department of Labor has been considering a number of changes to the regulations governing the overtime exemptions, including a further increase in the minimum salary threshold, and proposed rule changes are expected soon. On January 29, a group of twenty-six Democratic senators co-signed a letter to the President, recommending that the salary threshold be doubled, to at least $56,680 per year, and indexed to inflation.  Although the proposed new rule is scheduled for publication by the DOL this month, it is not known whether the DOL will meet that schedule.

Traditionally, hourly-paid wage earners give value to their employers more or less in direct proportion to the time that they spend on the job; productivity is measured by hours worked.  Productivity in the exempt categories is less linear, with creativity, exercise of discretion, and independent judgment as measures of value.  The proposal for a significant increase in the annual salary threshold may be viewed largely as a means of raising wages by expanding the number of workers who qualify for overtime pay, regardless of whether their duties are otherwise “exempt” in nature.  However, since $155 in 1975 dollars would be worth $682 today, there is a legitimate argument for some increase in the salary threshold to maintain consistency in the regulatory scheme.

Tags: Wages

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts


Jump to Page