New Massachusetts Non-Compete Law and its Impact on Connecticut Employers

Connecticut companies with employees who work or live in Massachusetts must be aware of a recent Massachusetts law limiting the scope of noncompetition agreements entered into on or after October 1, 2018.

What if a Connecticut Employer Specifies that Connecticut Law Applies?

The law explicitly provides that a provision mandating the application of a different state law that would avoid application of the statute is not enforceable if the employee is, and has been, a resident of or employed in Massachusetts for at least 30 days before his or her employment ceases. Employers with employees who work or live in Massachusetts must therefore ensure that any noncompetition agreements they enter into with these employees comply with the new law, even if the agreement specifies that Connecticut (or some other state) law governs.

What is a “Noncompetition Agreement” under the New Law?

Under the new law (to be codified at Section 24L of Chapter 149 of the Massachusetts General Laws), a “noncompetition agreement” is defined as an agreement between an employer and employee (or otherwise arising out of an existing or anticipated employment relationship), under which the employee or expected employee agrees that he or she will not engage in certain specified activities competitive with his or her employer after the employment relationship has ended.

Employers should note that the term “noncompetition agreement” excludes certain types of agreements, including covenants not to solicit or hire employees of the employer; covenants not to solicit or transact business with customers, clients or vendors of the employer; and certain noncompetition agreements made in connection with the sale of a business entity. The term also excludes confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements; invention assignment agreements; and agreements outside of an employment relationship.

What are Some Other Key Provisions of the New Law?

  • The law applies to both for-profit and not-for-profit entities and defines “employee” (for purposes of this statute only) to include independent contractors.
  • A noncompetition agreement must be in writing and signed by both the employer and the employee, and must expressly state that the employee has the right to consult with counsel before signing.
  • To be enforceable, the noncompetition agreement must be provided to the employee within certain timeframes—that is, if the agreement is entered into in connection with the commencement of employment, it must be provided to the employee by the earlier of the date of a formal offer of employment or 10 business days before commencement of employment. Agreements entered into after commencement of employment (but not in connection with a separation of employment) must be provided at least 10 business days before the agreement is to become effective. The law specifies that these agreements must also be supported by consideration other than continuation of employment.
  • Agreements entered into in connection with a separation from employment are not “noncompetition agreements” under the terms of the statute, but only if the employee is given seven business days to rescind acceptance.
  • The geographic reach in a noncompetition agreement must be reasonable in relation to the interests protected. A presumption of reasonableness exists if the geographic reach is limited to only those areas in which the employee, during any time during the last two years of employment, provided services or had a material presence or influence.
  • The temporal restriction in a noncompetition agreement may not be more than 12 months from the date of cessation of employment. There is an exception, however, in the case of an employee who has breached a fiduciary duty to the employer or has unlawfully taken property (“physically or electronically”) belonging to the employer. In these cases, the duration may not exceed two years from the date of cessation of employment.
  • The agreement must include a “garden leave” clause. A garden leave clause requires the employer to pay the employee during the restricted period. The law specifies that garden leave pay must be at least half of the employee’s highest annualized base salary within the two years preceding termination or “other mutually agreed upon consideration” that has been specified in the agreement, although the statute does not provide guidance on what is meant by “other mutually agreed upon consideration.” If the restricted period is extended beyond 12 months because the employee has breached his/her fiduciary duty to the employer or has unlawfully taken property of the employer, the employer need not pay for garden leave during any extension of the restricted period.
  • The scope of the agreement must be no broader than necessary to protect the employer’s trade secrets; confidential information that would not otherwise qualify as a trade secret; and/or the employer’s goodwill, and the agreement must be reasonable in the scope of prohibited activities in relation to the interests protected. The law specifies certain presumptions that will satisfy these requirements.
  • Noncompetition agreements are not enforceable against certain types of employees, including employees who are classified as non-exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act; employees who are 18 years of age or younger; certain student interns; and employees who have been terminated without cause or laid off.

Takeaways for Connecticut Employers

While noncompetition agreements signed before October 1, 2018 are not affected by this law, Connecticut employers must ensure that noncompetes entered into on and after that date comply for both employees and contractors who work or reside in Massachusetts.  Employers who are unsure of their obligations are advised to contact experienced counsel.

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

PDF
Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, immigration law and union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page