More Lawsuits for Unpaid Wages Will Result in Double Damages

Connecticut law has long allowed an employee to sue his employer in a civil action to collect unpaid wages, Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-68 and 31-72.  In addition to the collection of the amount of unpaid wages, these statutes also provided for “double damages,” that is, twice the amount of wages owed.  However, the courts had interpreted the double damages provision as requiring proof that the employer had not merely failed to pay wages required by law, but had also acted arbitrarily, unreasonably, or in bad faith.  Under this standard, double damages awards were relatively few.

But the statutes were amended effective October 1, 2015 to improve the rights of a plaintiff/employee.  Now the standard remedy for a lawsuit for unpaid wages is double damages, which the employer can avoid, and limit the damages award only to the actual amount of unpaid wages, only by establishing that it had “a good faith belief that underpayment of wages was in compliance with the law.”

A recent decision from the Hartford Superior Court in the case of Shaneque Stevens v. Vito’s By The Water, LLC, has provided an interpretation of “good faith belief.”  The case concerned a claim that a restaurant had not correctly applied the tip credit available under Connecticut wage-hour law for compliance with the minimum wage requirements for waiters and waitresses, resulting in  underpayment of the minimum wage.

The Department of Labor has issued detailed and somewhat complex regulations on the applicability of the tip credit, but the testimony in the case showed that the restaurant owner had not taken any active steps to ascertain whether his method of deducting the tip credit from the minimum wage complied with the law.  As the court said, he was ignorant of the law.  Moreover, the owner could not show that he had specifically inquired of a knowledgeable source as to whether the restaurant’s pay practices were compliant.

The court ruled that the restaurant had not demonstrated good faith and that the plaintiff was entitled to receive double damages. Consistent with federal court interpretations of analogous sections of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Connecticut court held that good faith requires more than ignorance of the prevailing law or uncertainty of legal requirements.  Good faith requires a demonstration that an employer took active steps to learn the requirements of the law, and then to implement compliance.

The statutes as amended place a greater burden of proof on the employer to avoid an award of double damages. The take-away for employers is to review their pay practices in any complex area, such as tip credits, waiting time, travel time, exemptions or the like, so that if a  mistake occurs in payment of wages, it is no more than a good faith mistake which avoids payment of double damages.

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts


Jump to Page