“May I Record A Conversation With My Employee Without His Knowledge?”

HR BallAt the Pullman & Comley Labor, Employment, and Employee Benefits Seminar recently, I was asked by one of the attendees, an HR Director, whether she could record a disciplinary meeting with a troublesome employee without telling the employee. This is a question that comes up from time to time. More often, it’s an employee who has surreptitiously recorded conversations, and seeks to use the recordings against the employer in legal or administrative proceedings.

This is a more complicated subject than you might think. Among other things, it's important to distinguish between phone calls and face-to-face conversations, and to distinguish employer-employee conversations from other conversations.   In Connecticut:

  1. It's illegal (a class D felony) to record (or overhear using any device) a phone conversation of which you're neither the sender nor receiver, without the consent of either the sender or the receiver. See Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-187 through 53a-189.
  2. It's illegal (an unclassified misdemeanor) for an employer to monitor (audio or video) employees in areas designed for their personal comfort or for safeguarding their possessions, such as rest rooms, locker rooms or lounges. See Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-48b(b).
  3. It's illegal (an unclassified misdemeanor) for an employer to intentionally overhear or record any conversation about employment contract negotiations with an employee or employee representative unless all parties to the conversation consent. See Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-48(b)(d). The statute clearly applies to collective bargaining negotiations, but may also apply to other circumstances.
  4. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-48d requires employers who engage in any form of electronic monitoring of employees -- including both audio and video recording -- to warn employees in writing and/or post a notice in a conspicuous place that describes the types of monitoring that the employer may use. Violation of the statute may subject the employer to civil penalties.   It's not clear whether recording a disciplinary meeting, such as discussed in the article, would fall under this statute. The statute doesn’t apply if the employer has reasonable grounds to believe that employees are violating the law, violating the legal rights of the employer or other employees, or creating a hostile workplace environment, and electronic monitoring may produce evidence of the misconduct.
  5. It's not illegal in the criminal sense, but you can be sued civilly for recording a phone conversation - even one in which you participate - unless you obtain the consent of all parties, or warn all parties at the beginning of the conversation, or use a device that produces a warning tone every 15 seconds. See Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d. There are a number of exceptions to this prohibition, mostly related to law enforcement.
  6. There is no law in Connecticut that penalizes you for recording a face-to-face conversation in which you participate, even without the consent of the other person. One court decision suggests that the other person could sue you for the tort of invasion of privacy, but I suspect the case is an aberration. See WVIT v. Gray, 1996 WL 649335, 18 Conn.L.Rptr. 203 (Sup. Ct. October 25, 1996).
  7. Of course, none of the above addresses the question whether the recording – even if legally made – will be admissible in evidence in any suit or other proceeding. That’s a possible subject for another blog post.

Bottom line -- don't record phone conversations without everyone's consent, or at least providing notice. In general, outside the employment context, you can secretly record a face-to-face conversation in which you participate, but you could be sued for invasion of privacy. In the workplace, it's probably ok to surreptitiously record face-to-face conversations if you're the employee, again at some risk of an invasion of privacy claim. If you're an employer who wants to secretly record an employee (such as the disciplinary meeting I was asked about) tread very carefully. Call your attorney and discuss the specific circumstances to understand your risks.

Posted in Labor & Unions

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

PDF
Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, immigration law and union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page