Illinois Appellate Court Won't Enforce Noncompetes Against At-Will Employees Unless the Employee Stays At Least Two Years: Implications for Connecticut Employers

You’re a Connecticut employer with a restrictive covenant program to protect your customer relationships and confidential business information.  You require anyone you hire who to develop customer relationships or use your confidential business information to sign reasonable noncompete/non-solicitation agreements at the beginning of employment.  You’re confident you’ve immunized yourself from a claim that the covenants are invalid due to a lack of consideration.  Similarly situated Illinois employers thought the same way until their intermediate appellate court ruled there is no consideration for this covenant unless the at will employee remains with them for at least two years (the Illinois Supreme Court recently refused to review the decision).  The question is do Connecticut employers have anything to fear here?

The answer is they shouldn’t, but they may.  They shouldn’t because Illinois law is different from Connecticut law on consideration for non-competes.  Both states purportedly require “adequate consideration” for these covenants to be enforceable, but Illinois takes the adequacy piece seriously where the consideration is simply at-will employment.  The concern is that the employment relationship could end in a matter of months or even weeks, and the employee’s subsequent activities may be significantly restrained for the next two or three years.  So, to further its concept of fairness, Illinois says that unless the employee stays for two years, the consideration (at will employment) is inadequate and tantamount to no consideration.

Connecticut courts mouth the words “adequate consideration” in noncompete cases, but there’s no special consideration rule for these cases.  General contract law principles apply, and in Connecticut the relative value of the consideration does not matter.  Consideration is sufficient even if it isn’t equal.

So, why do Connecticut employers possibly have something to fear from the Illinois case?  It’s because when a Connecticut employer goes to state court to win a temporary injunction against the former employee, it’s asking the court to render a decision it has discretion to make.  This means that even if the employer proves its case, the court can still refuse an injunction if it believes it would be unfair to enjoin the employee under the circumstances.  And where the circumstances are an at will employment that lasted only three months and a non-compete that lasts for two or three years, a Connecticut court might consider this unbalanced and unfair.

The takeaway?  To feel more confident in the enforceability of your covenant, don’t end an at will employment too quickly, or make sure you give the employee something besides at will employment at the beginning of the employment.

Richard C. Robinson practices in the area of business litigation including the litigation of construction and employment disputes.

Posted in Appellate

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

PDF
Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, immigration law and union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page