Executive Order 9I Exempts Travel to New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island from Affected State COVID-19 Quarantine List
iStock-1208623485.jpg (iStock-1208623485.jpg)

As COVID-19 test positivity rates in Connecticut become more ominous and the long-feared fall “second wave” rears its ugly head,  Governor Lamont’s executive orders regarding travel into Connecticut continue to evolve.  The Governor’s latest executive order on travel into Connecticut – Executive Order 9I – was issued on October 27, 2020 and effectively exempts the states of New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island from quarantine restrictions by removing these states from the “Affected State” travel restriction list regardless of their COVID-19 test positivity rates.  As a result of this change, employers may wish to modify their out-of-state travel policies to clarify that New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island are exempt from the Affected State travel list pursuant to Executive Order 9I.

Back in July with the issuance of Executive Order 7III Connecticut first imposed mandatory self-quarantine requirements for travel into Connecticut from so-called “Affected States.”  An “Affected State” as defined under Executive Order 7III and carried forward in Executive Order 9I – subject to the New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island exemption mentioned above – is a state “with a positive test rate higher than 10 per 100,000 residents, or higher than a 10% test positivity rate over a seven-day rolling average.”  Every Tuesday the list of states meeting either of these criteria is updated and published on the State of Connecticut’s COVID-19 response page.

In September, with the issuance of Executive Order 9B, mandatory self-quarantine requirements were also added for travel into Connecticut from “Affected Countries.”  An “Affected Country,” as first defined in Executive Order 9B and carried forward in Executive Order 9I, is a country “for which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued a Level 3 Travel Health Notice.”  A list of countries meeting this criteria – at this point an overwhelming majority of countries in the world – is available through the CDC’s website.  

Under Connecticut law as set forth in the Governor’s executive orders, travelers who have spent at least twenty-four hours in an Affected State or Affected Country within fourteen days of arriving in Connecticut must either self-quarantine for fourteen days from the date of last contact with the Affected State or Affected Country or submit proof of a negative COVID-19 test to the Connecticut Commissioner of Public Health.  Per Executive Order 9I, “[o]nly results for nucleic acid COVID-19 tests, such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests,” are acceptable, and such tests must have been taken either within seventy-two hours prior to arrival in Connecticut or any time after arrival.  Notwithstanding this requirement, certain essential workers who either return to Connecticut or travel into the state from Affected States or Affected Countries are exempt from quarantine requirements if their travel was, or is, for work purposes.

According to the frequently asked questions section of Connecticut’s COVID-19 response page, the new exemption from the Affected States’ list for New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island was made in consideration of the fact that these states are extremely interconnected with Connecticut and share common modes of transportation.  Notably, while our neighbors to the east, west and south were exempted, our bordering neighbor to the north – Massachusetts – was not included in Executive Order 9I’s exemption list.  While it is unclear exactly why this is the case, it may be due to the fact that as of October 27, 2020, Massachusetts qualified as a COVID-19 Affected State.

What Does This Mean for Employers?  If you have an existing COVID-19 out-of-state travel policy in place you may elect to amend the language in your policy so that it aligns with Executive Order 9I’s exemption for travel to New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island.  However, in considering such a change be mindful that there is no prohibition on Connecticut employers imposing employee travel, testing and quarantine restrictions that are more restrictive than Governor Lamont’s executive orders.  Employers are free to impose more stringent COVID-19 travel policies than the law mandates, but in so doing must be careful not to run afoul of legal obligations under other laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, not to mention any applicable employee contract or collective bargaining agreement provisions.  As always, if your organization is unsure of its obligations under the Governor’s executive orders or any other COVID-19 guidance please contact our Labor and Employment law attorneys for assistance.

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

PDF
Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, immigration law and union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page