Employer Required to Reimburse Employee For Medical Marijuana Treatment

Rachel-GinsburgThe Court of Appeals of New Mexico issued a decision last week that many employers believe flies in the face of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 (“CSA”), and the Justice Department’s August 29, 2013 Memorandum.  Are employers over-reacting?

Sandra Lewis works for Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., a property casualty third party administrator.  In 1998, she suffered a work-related injury to her lower back and after undergoing several surgical procedures, currently suffers from post-laminectomy syndrome, a condition for which she is prescribed medical marijuana under New Mexico’s Compassionate Use Act.

At the administrative level, the workers’ compensation judge ruled that Lewis’ use of marijuana constituted “reasonable and necessary” medical care and required Gallagher Bassett to reimburse Lewis for the cost of her marijuana treatment.  Gallagher Bassett appealed, claiming that complying with the judge’s order would require the company to violate the CSA, specifically, section 841A(a), which prohibits a person from knowingly possessing a specific amount of a controlled substance.  The company argued that by paying for Lewis’ treatment, it was aiding and abetting her violation of the CSA.

The Court of Appeals dismissed the company’s argument and affirmed the judge’s decision.  The Court of Appeals ruled that the Justice Department’s memorandum identifies eight areas where it will focus its enforcement and the Court noted that medical marijuana was not one of them.

The treatment of medical marijuana by courts tends to fall into one of two camps:  (1) those that adhere strictly to federal law and (2) those that uphold state-regulated programs notwithstanding federal law.  Coats v. Dish Network, LLC, discussed in an earlier blog post, is an example of those judges who are in the first camp, and this decision is clearly an example of the second.  This split presents a challenge to multi-state employers.  It is uncertain where Connecticut will stand on the issue since no court has considered the issue.

My colleague, Megan Carannante and I, will be discussing medical marijuana laws nationwide in more depth in a live webinar on October 15, 2015 from 1:00 PM – 2: 30 PM titled “Weed Out the Confusion About Marijuana Use Law."  Stay tuned for more details.

Posted in Cannabis

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

PDF
Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, immigration law and union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page