Connecticut Medical Marijuana Statute - Is It Sowing the Seeds of Employer Discontent?

With the enactment of Connecticut’s medical marijuana, Connecticut became the 17th State in the Union to pass legislation legalizing the use of pot in one way or another.  As of today, 20 states and the District of Columbia have enacted legislation and that number will likely continue to grow. 

Connecticut has now approved comprehensive regulations which will certainly usher in growth in the number of patients who are approved to use medical marijuana.  Production and dispensing licenses may be awarded by the winter of 2014 – although that is yet to be seen based on some of the political issues at stake.  Eventually, Connecticut will certainly see a burgeoning new industry comprised of state-based pot growers and separate retail dispensaries servicing more than 1,000 certified patients -- which is just the beginning of the patient population that will seek certification over the next few years. 

This population of patients is already raising significant questions for employers who may have employees who use medical marijuana in order to combat chronic health conditions.  Employers are now asking how they should deal with those employees who are certified users and report to work under the influence.  Employers are also asking about their rights to discipline employees who may have trace amounts of cannabis in their systems which could be detected through legitimate drug and alcohol screening processes.

The short answer to this question is that the various state statutes enacted, including Connecticut’s, simply provide certified patients with protection against criminal prosecution by the state for their use and possession of marijuana.  These statutes provide no protection under Federal law or against an employer’s right to enact and enforce their drug screening and substance abuse policies as they apply to the workplace.  See Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 764 F.Supp.2d 914 (W.D. Mich. 2011); Roe v. TeleTech Customer Care Mgmt. LLC, 257 P.3d 586, 24 A.D. Cases 1281 (Wash. 2011); and Emerald Steel Fabricators Inc. v. Bureau of Labor and Industry, 230 P.3d 518, 23 A.D. Cases 1 (Or. 2010).

In fact, employers defending their employment decisions have successfully argued that given the dichotomy between these states’ marijuana laws and federal law (which classifies the possession and use of cannabis as a felony involving a Schedule I drug under The Controlled Substances Act 21 U.S.C, §812 (2006)), federal law preempts state law notwithstanding the issuance of certification cards allowing use at the state level.  Employers have asserted, and courts have agreed, that employers have the right to discipline and terminate employees whose marijuana use violates company policies, creates a risk of accidents or results in poor performance. 

Therefore, based on the current state of the law, a marijuana user who comes to work high or with pot in his/her system, faces the same risk of discipline and termination as if he/she came to work drunk or high on any other legal narcotic. 

An employee’s assertion that he/she is protected from employer discipline because of his or her card-carrying medical marijuana status will go up in smoke.

Andrew C. Glassman is chair of the Business and Finance practice. His practice includes corporate law, commercial transactions and employment and labor relations advisory services.

 

Posted in Cannabis

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

PDF
Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, immigration law and union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page