Latest Posts

Posts in U.S. Supreme Court.
Red Light, Green Light: A Status Update on Federal Vaccine Mandates for Private Employers
iStock-healthcare-employee-vaccine.jpg (iStock-healthcare-employee-vaccine.jpg)
Supreme Court’s Sulyma Decision Creates Proof of Actual Knowledge Issue for Plan Fiduciaries
SCOTUS
Supreme Court Extends Title VII Protections to Gay and Transgender Employees in Bostock v. Clayton County
SCOTUS
Schools Must Take Care to Follow Established Complaint Procedures When Investigating Student Complaints of Sexual Harassment Against Employees In Order to Avoid Potential Liability for Sex Discrimination
New Guidance from State and Federal Courts for Employers Who Require Arbitration of Employment Disputes
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. AFSCME on “agency” or “service” fees for non-union members: What public sector employers must (immediately) know
BREAKING….SUPREME COURT ISSUES DECISION IN JANUS V. AFSCME CO. 31 – AGENCY SHOP DEEMED UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND AGENCY FEES MAY NOT BE CONTINUALLY DEDUCTED WITHOUT AFFIRMATIVE EMPLOYEE CONSENT
AN EARLY HALLOWEEN TRICK FOR CONNECTICUT’S PUBLIC-SECTOR LABOR UNIONS: WILL JANUS V. AFSCME, CO. 31 BE THE END OF THE AGENCY SHOP?
Gender Identity Bathroom Access - From Schools To The Workplace
Some Workers Compensation Principles That Are Often Misunderstood
Post-Friedrichs, The Agency Fee Ground Is Still Shaking Mightily, But For A Different Reason
Be Aware of Public Employees Disciplinary Proceedings Protections: Loudermill, Weingarten and Garrity
They Also Serve Who Only Stand and Wait – At No Extra Charge
A Question To Be Answered By The Supreme Court: Should You Discuss The Obvious At Job Interviews?
State Law Can Override Control Test for Employment
Hear No Evil; See No Evil: The General Corporate Knowledge Presumption
Supreme Court Defines "Clothes"
Employee Gripes: When Employers Should Take Them Seriously
The Meaning of “But-For” Harassment: The Second Circuit Breaks Its Silence and it is not Good for Employers
Supreme Court Hears Argument on Latest "Donning" and "Doffing" Wage Case

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, immigration law and union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page