Can Watching Grandchildren Entitle Employee To FMLA Leave?

LR_elderly-child-holding-hands-rgb-largeAs all employers covered by the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) are well aware, that Act requires them to provide up to 12 weeks of leave to employees providing care to covered family members with a serious health condition.  While a spouse, son, daughter, or parent is a covered family member under the FMLA, a grandchild it not.  Until recently, employers could reasonably conclude that the FMLA does not require them to provide leave to an employee seeking to provide care to grandchildren.  However, a June 24, 2014 decision by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals may have employers rethinking that conclusion, at least in circumstances where caring for the grandchildren assists a covered family member with a serious health condition.  In Gienapp v. Harbor Crest the Seventh Circuit concluded that an employee who cared for the children of her daughter while her daughter was receiving treatment for thyroid cancer was entitled to federal FMLA leave for periods spent providing such care.  Noting that “care” for which leave must be granted under the federal FMLA includes “psychological as well as physical assistance”, the Gienapp Court concluded that the “mental boost” the employee provided her daughter by watching her daughter’s children constituted “care” to a covered family member.

Perhaps recognizing that it was venturing into uncharted legal waters with its expansive interpretation of “care” under the FMLA, the Court was careful to limit its holding to situations where an employee requesting FMLA leave to watch grandchildren was also at least purporting to utilize such leave to provide direct physical assistance (such as assisting with basic medical, hygienic, or nutritional/safety needs or transporting her to a doctor) to a covered member with a serious health condition.  It appears relatively clear from the entire record that the employee in Gienapp was not in fact providing any such direct physical assistance to her daughter, but instead was using the entirety of her leave for the sole purpose of watching her grandchildren.  The Court nevertheless seized upon the employer’s failure to dispute the employee’s  assertion that she watched her grandchildren in the course of providing other unspecified care to her daughter to conclude to the contrary.  Thus, the Court refrained from directly holding that periods spent exclusively watching grandchildren to provide psychological comfort to a covered family member with a serious health condition constitute covered FMLA leave.  Instead, the Court carefully concluded that the employee’s use of some of her leave to watch her grandchildren did not disqualify those periods from coverage under FMLA.

Employer Takeaway

As Connecticut’s FMLA largely mirrors its federal counterpart, Connecticut employers can reasonably expect this decision to be utilized as precedent by Courts construing Connecticut’s Act.  However, the Gienapp decision does not dictate that employers start automatically granting FMLA leave to employees seeking to care for grandchildren, but instead suggests that employers should think twice before denying such requests as a matter of course.  And while the decision is clearly an outlier, employers should, for now, review requests for leave involving  grandchild care carefully, recognizing that such care may be entitled to coverage under the FMLA if it is accompanied by direct physical care to a covered family member with a serious medical condition.   While the Court’s rationale could arguably support a finding that employers are required to provide FMLA leave to employees for the sole purpose of watching the children of a family member with a serious health condition, such a position appears contrary to the great weight of existing precedent at the moment.

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

PDF
Subscribe to Updates

About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, immigration law and union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Education Law Notes

For What It May Be Worth

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page