Transgender Student Restroom Assignment Revisited

hYou may recall my colleague Zachary Schurin’s recent  discussion of Doe V. Regional School Unit 26. In that matter, the Maine Supreme Court determined that the defendant school district’s requirement that a transgender student utilize a unisex staff bathroom, instead of the communal student bathroom for girls (the gender the student identified with), violated a Maine sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination law (the Maine Human Rights Act).  That Court overturned the Superior Court’s finding to the contrary and remanded the case for fur further proceedings. The case was again in the news this month, when the Associated Press reported that the Penobscot County Superior Court, upon remand, issued an order awarding the student $75,000 in damages and attorneys’ fees. The Court also issued an order prohibiting the district from "refusing access by transgender students to school restrooms that are consistent with their gender identity.”

While obviously not binding upon Connecticut districts, which are governed by Connecticut law as interpreted by Connecticut Courts, the Maine Court’s findings are largely in harmony with guidance from the CT Safe School Coalition pertaining to compliance with Connecticut’s gender identity and expression non-discrimination laws (Public Act 11-55).  The CT Safe School Coalition has suggested that schools are obligated under Connecticut law to provide transgender students with access to the restroom consistent with their gender identity.

The CT Safe School Coalition has also suggested, however, that it may be appropriate to assign a transgender student an alternative restroom, such as a unisex single stall restroom, if the transgender student and administrator feel there is a desire or need for increased privacy or safety.  The guidance goes on to expressly note that “[u]nder no circumstances may a student be required to use a restroom facility that is inconsistent with that student’s asserted gender identity.”

While we do not yet have judicial interpretation of appropriate restroom access for transgender students under Public Act 11-55, we may not have to wait too long.  As previously noted by my colleague Zach Schurin, restroom usage constitutes “one of the most complicated and controversial issues facing transgender students and school districts...”

Posted in Transgender

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

Subscribe to Updates

About Our School Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s School Law practice on federal and Connecticut law as it pertains to educational institutions, whether those institutions be public school districts, private K-12 schools, or post-secondary colleges and universities.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

For What It May Be Worth

Working Together

Recent Posts


Jump to Page