OSEP Speaks Again: Ensure Your Evaluations Address All Areas of Potential Concern

LR-PencilOn October 22, 2016, the US Department of Education’s  Office of Special Education Programs (“OSEP”), via its latest informal guidance/opinion letter (“Letter to Carroll”), once again addressed whether, once a school district’s evaluation is complete and the parents communicate a desire for a child to be assessed in an area in which they have not previously expressed concern, the district has a right to conduct its own evaluation in that area before the parent has a right to request an Independent Educational Evaluation (“IEE”).

BACKGROUND  ON IEEs

Generally speaking,  a parent who disagrees with  a district’s evaluation may request an IEE.  Once a parent has requested an IEE, the district has only two options:

  1. Initiate a due process hearing to show that its evaluation is appropriate; or
  2. Ensure that an IEE is provided at district expense, unless the district demonstrates at a due process hearing that the evaluation obtained by the parent did not meet the district’s criteria.

The parent, however, is only entitled to one IEE each time that the district conducts an evaluation.

OSEP’S GUIDANCE IN ”LETTER TO CAROLL”

OSEP once again reiterated its belief that the parent has a right to request an IEE in any area, even one that was not previously evaluated and/or over which the parent had not previously expressed a concern.  OSEP noted its belief that it is the district’s responsibility to ensure that the original “evaluation is sufficiently comprehensive to assess the child in all areas related to the suspected disability, and must identify all of the child’s special needs, whether or not commonly linked to the disability category in which the child has been classified.”

TAKEAWAY?

In light of OSEP’s repeated stance, it is best for a school district to ensure that each evaluation or reevaluation it is conducting is comprehensive and addresses each area of potential concern regarding the student.  A school district cannot rely on a parent raising a specific concern or requesting a specific evaluation before deciding to conduct that evaluation.  Otherwise, the district runs the risk of the parent having a right to an IEE without the district ever having a chance to evaluate the student in the area of concern

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

PDF
Subscribe to Updates

About Our School Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s School Law practice on federal and Connecticut law as it pertains to educational institutions, whether those institutions be public school districts, private K-12 schools, or post-secondary colleges and universities.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Working Together

Connecticut Health Law Blog

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page