Get Ready for the Changing Landscape of Expulsions

student in trouble at schoolThe legislature, this year, put in place significant changes relative to the expulsion of students which will supposedly go into effect on August 15, 2017. Assuming that the legislature leaves intact these changes during the 2017 legislative session, Districts will need to update their policies and programs in advance of the 2017-2018 school year.

Expulsion Hearing Process

Districts will now be required to provide parents with a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice prior to an expulsion hearing.  The parent also has a right to have the hearing postponed for up to one week to allow time for the parent to get an advocate.  The only exception is “if an emergency exists.”  This may often result in the student returning to school prior to the expulsion hearing being held because a student can only be suspended for up to ten (10) consecutive school days.

In addition to information about available free and low cost legal representation (which is already required by law), expulsion notices must now contain information concerning the parent/guardian and student’s general legal rights. The statute now explicitly provides that a student  may be represented by an attorney or a non-attorney advocate at the expulsion hearing, although this was a right that had been previously recognized as basic due process by most school districts.

A student who committed an expellable offense who is seeking to return to school having participated in a “diversionary” program, and who has not yet been expelled, must be allowed to return to school and the district may not seek to expel the student. A similar provision already exists for students seeking to return to school after having been detained in a juvenile detention center, the Connecticut Juvenile Training School, or any other residential placement

Alternative Education During the Expulsion

The Act eliminates the exception to providing an alternative education for students between the ages of 16 and 18 who committed certain drug and weapons violations and now requires an alternative education for all students through age 18.

Perhaps the most impactful change (educationally and fiscally) is that children under the age of sixteen (16) must be provided an alternative education during expulsion that includes:

  1. 180 school days per year, and a minimum of 900 hours total per year (which is an average of five (5) hours of instruction per day); and
  2. Each student must have an individualized learning plan

This revision presents a significant increase over what had been the norm. Children between the ages of sixteen (16) and eighteen (18), expelled for the first time, who wish to continue their education, must be offered an alternative education that meets the same criteria if he or she complies with the conditions established by his or her local or regional school board.  Students age seventeen or older may be placed in an adult education program for purposes of alternative education.

Additional Requirements Related to Weapons and Drugs

The Act expands the school’s police reporting requirement for certain offenses. In addition to required reporting for possession of a firearm, it will also be required for deadly weapons, dangerous instrument and marital arts weapons.

If a student is expelled for sale or distribution of a controlled substance, whose manufacture, distribution, sale, prescription, dispensing, transporting or possessing with intent to sell or dispense, offer or administer is subject to criminal penalties, the board of education must refer the student to an appropriate state or local agency for rehabilitation, intervention or job training and inform the agency of its action.

Changes to Truancy Statute

The Act also makes changes to the truancy provisions. Effective August 15,  2017, the Act eliminates a child’s truancy as permissible grounds for filing a “Family with Service Needs” complaint.  It requires that schools with a disproportionately high truancy rate implement (by August 15, 2018) an approved intervention model, to be developed by the Connecticut State Department of Education.  The school district will then be required to revise its truancy policy to reflect this intervention model.

School districts need to review and update their policies and programs prior to August 15, 2017 regarding expulsion, discipline and truancy in order to comply with these new provisions. Stay tuned for additional developments.  For a full listing and analysis of legislative enactments affecting Connecticut public schools, please feel free to request a copy of the firm’s annual legislative summary by contacting Mandy Buckley at

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

Subscribe to Updates

About Our School Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s School Law practice on federal and Connecticut law as it pertains to educational institutions, whether those institutions be public school districts, private K-12 schools, or post-secondary colleges and universities.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

For What It May Be Worth

Working Together

Recent Posts


Jump to Page