A Reprieve To Mandatory Implementation Of The Uniform School Calendar

calendar for WWFH inviteOn May 3, 2014, the Connecticut General Assembly passed House of Representatives Bill No. 5559, amending, inter alia, General Statutes Section 10-66q  (the bill, as amended and passed, also creates a new apprenticeship grant program under the Standardized Training and Employment Program and expands an existing child day care licensing exemption to apply to any day care service that a municipal agency or department administers).  Section 10-66q, enacted last year, previously permitted a local or regional board of education to adopt the uniform regional school calendar developed by its regional educational service center for the 2014-2015 school year, and required that each such board do so prior to July 1, 2015.  House Bill No. 5559, however, delays Section 10-66q’s uniform school calendar mandatory adoption and implementation obligations by one year, until July 1, 2016.  The bill also permits a district to further delay the mandates by an extra year, until July 1, 2017, if the existence of a collective bargaining agreement makes implementation of the uniform regional school calendar “impossible.”

The bill itself provides no insight as to what constitutes impossibility under a collective bargaining agreement. Does “impossible” simply mean that immediate unilateral implementation would subject the district to unfair labor practice claims under the Teacher Negotiation Act or the Municipal Employees Relations Act? Or does it instead require districts, where necessary, to mid-term or impact bargain to impasse before declaring impossibility? Whatever the proper interpretation may be, this debate may prove largely academic if the regional education service centers are able to provide sufficient flexibility within the adopted uniform calendar to permit most districts to implement such within the confines of their existing labor agreements.

This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.

Subscribe to Updates

About Our School Law Blog

Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s School Law practice on federal and Connecticut law as it pertains to educational institutions, whether those institutions be public school districts, private K-12 schools, or post-secondary colleges and universities.

Other Blogs by Pullman & Comley

Connecticut Health Law Blog

For What It May Be Worth

Working Together

Recent Posts


Jump to Page